A little background: when I was younger and my dad was a technologist, every so often he’d go to Washington DC to go talk to some people about technology stuff. He was always super cryptic about it and we’d joke that he was a CIA informant. To this day I don’t know what he was doing, advising someone about something. Which is just my roundabout way of starting this post about talking to the White House last week.
By “White House” in this case I mean Valerie Green, the Director of Presidential Personnel at the White House. I’m not 100% sure how I wound up talking to her and Amanda Moose, her special assistant, about the incoming Librarian of Congress but I think it went something like this…
I have, as you know, been agitating about the incoming Librarian of Congress, making sure librarians get their voices heard about this appointment. The job is a lifetime position and is often given to late-career historians. James Billington was such a person. While he did some good things for LoC in his tenure, he probably should have retired earlier and there have been legitimate criticisms of some of the things he did and did not do. I made the Librarian of Progress website and wrote an article about this for Medium. The #nextloc hashtag? That one is mine. Medium is one of those online writing platforms. They employ me to do some writing. Other people also write for them who are not employed there, for example Jason Goldman, the White House’s Chief Digital Officer.
Jason wrote an article talking about what he was doing there and I responded. We tweeted back and forth a few times. I sent him a copy of my article when I wrote it. He emailed in early July that I should chat with Valerie Green. I said “Sure, happy to continue the conversation” and then didn’t hear anything until I got an email this past Tuesday asking if I was free for a phone call with Valerie the next day at noon. Noon wasn’t super convenient but when the White House says “Free for a phone call?” the right answer is yes. I have this to say about the White House: of all the people who I have had phone meetings with in the last year or so, they were the most on time and the most prepared. The forty-five minutes I spent talking to Valerie and Amanda were a delight and not just because I felt like I was advancing my cause, both of them were pleasant and smart people who asked great questions and seemed to value my time and their own.
We talked for about 45 minutes about what the job of Librarian of Congress entailed, where Billington didn’t help, what a new person could really do to change things, and why it matters. I felt listened to and they laughed at my jokes. One of the most interesting questions they asked, besides “Has your opinion changed about what the job entails after talking to people about it for a month?” (it has) was about whether I thought people would be really hostile towards basically any appointee in today’s political climate or if there were people who might please everyone (not who were they but just did such people exist). I got to tell them how much I thought certain high profile possible choices were going to be lightning rods (in a mannerly and polite way) and how I was very concerned that media industry people would be trying to stack the deck in favor of their people. I also told them that some people–loud internet people–would probably hate whoever got picked but if they at least felt listened to it would matter a lot. That is, I think a lot of people would be disappointed if the incoming LoC was another older white man, but that could be mitigated somewhat if that person had a serious plan in place for working on LoC’s diversity issues that was front and center of their early communications.
I gave them a long list of people to talk to, primarily people at smaller libraries or representing underrepresented groups in librarianship. They seemed to appreciate that I’d thought about this a lot but also wasn’t a zealot about it. We had a nice and reasonable conversation and I felt upbeat about it afterwards particularly about my biggest fear which was that the job would go to some industry hack who was determined to wrest the Copyright Office from the clutches of the library. All in all, a very good discussion.
Thank you, Jessamyn, for everything you do to advocate for libraries. Not just this (very important) time, but every time, every day.
Seriously, Jessamyn, this is the best. I trust you as an advocate for the profession times a million.
Thank you, Jessamyn. I can only second what Sarah and Jenna said.
Upon further reflection, I’m wondering how much they really want to know what to look for in a Librarian of Congress vs. how to avoid a PR fiasco.
I am also okay at helping people avoid PR fiascoes, it’s true.
You’re okay at a lot of things.
That’s so cool! It makes me happy that they reached out to you, Jessamyn. That was _very_ smart of them, and a very good sign.
Thanks for this. Just a note to note that, despite the outgoing Librarian’s saying so, the Librarian position is not a lifetime appointment.
Outstanding. I really think you’re making a difference. What impact will the right LoC have fifty years from now? Quite a bit, I’d wager.
Just catching up on this, but YAYAYAYAY. I echo everyone above: THANK YOU for doing this (and everything) and I am so, so encouraged that they talked to you.
Well done, Jessamyn! You embody the idea of progressive librarian better than anyone I’ve ever met. I wish I could nominate you for LOC!
Hi Jessalyn, from my personal (and unofficial) viewpoint the diversity issue for the people working at LC is actually going pretty well, given the situation. Folks on the staff tend to be civilized in their interactions, and represent about as many languages and races as you’d find anywhere outside the UN. Promotion and professional development is limited for everyone, not just African Americans, unfortunately, due to budget. Latino people are underrepresented, but my guess is it’s not so much for lack of outreach, but rather because of very little overall hiring and the fact that there’s no budget to pay for relocation of new employees from the West Coast or Texas. Regarding diversity in public programming … well, it’s not easy to be non-partisan these days, and so what you tend to get is public programs that are safe and historic. The overwhelming diversity issue you see at LC is age. When you downsize through attrition for 20 years, you don’t have all that many young people on staff. Glad you are taking an interest in the next Librarian, and hope you will be working at LC yourself sometime!