copyright laws slop over international borders, what do other librarians think?

I’m not talking much about copyright in my talk, but I have been boning up on some of the Australian library community’s responses to the Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) which passed in May. One of the things that AUSFTA did was “reduce differences” between US and Australian copyright law which, as you can probably guess, means the Australians get to tighten up their laws and bring them more in line with restrictive US laws that favor business uses of intellectual property over community and library uses. To this end, the Australian Libraries’ Copyright Committee released this Statement of Principles [word doc] which says, among other things

The recent conclusion of the Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) threatens to fundamentally shift the fine balance in our current copyright regime. The “harmonisation” of Australia’s copyright legislation to that of the United States as required by the treaty may have irreversible negative impacts unless balancing provisions are also introduced. The negative unintended consequences created by the introduction of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act 1999 (DMCA) in the United States are well recognised by copyright experts and commentators around the world.. Careful consideration needs to be given to the implementation of treaty obligations in order to avoid similar outcomes in Australia,

why don’t people read, part one in a series

As an outreach librarian, I try to figure out why people aren’t coming to the library. Some of these reasons are obvious: can’t park, bad hours, building too cold, don’t read…. When I get to answers like “don’t read” my next question is always “why not?” The answers are all over the map, but the one that drives me the craziest — since I work with a lot of seniors — is “can’t find large print titles in anything that interests me”. Now, our library has maybe a thousand large print titles, even some new ones, which is not a bad collection for a library our size. It’s mostly fiction. Non-fiction circulates less, and it’s also harder to get. Our largest request that comes to me is “more computer books in large type” followed by “more poetry” If you’re blind in the US, you can get books on tape delivered to you for free, but you often can’t choose the exact titles [think Netflix] and you don’t get the tactile experience of reading which many people really like. According to the Royal National Institute of the Blind in the UK 96% of all books are not available in large print, audio or braille editions. They have started a Right to Read campaign complete with arresting graphics and sound clip by Michael Palin, to raise people’s awareness of lack of access to reading materials for the blind and otherwise visually impaired. [pscott]

a rock and roll party in my mailbox

I wish everyone could work out their trademark and copyright animosity as well as The Postal Service and The US Postal Service have. Witness this ugly series of events [with follow-up] concerning a copy of Gone with the Wind that used to be on a Project Gutenberg Australia site.

The world’s protection of creative content may eventually settle at around the same level, say, life plus 70 years, [Mitchell’s heirs’ lawyer] said. The danger, he added, is that the most restrictive governments will be the ones setting that level. “National laws are going to infringe on copyrights around the world,” he said.