Library Journal has a thorough article reporting on the panel on the Google Books settlement that happened at Midwinter.
Mitch Freedman, past president of ALA, wondered about changes to the “free to all†ideology of libraries, asking whether Google would permit, as do other databases, site licenses for public libraries. [Google’s Dan] Clancy said that, given the consumer market, there was no agreement on remote access, but that could change down the road. “Authors and publishers were not comfortable with remote access.†While Freedman said that issue was resolved with database publishers, Clancy responded that those publishers don’t have a model aimed at consumers. He noted that “the challenge of selling into this market is not Google’s core competence,†so consortial discounts are authorized in the agreement.