by Jessamyn West
librarian.net/talks/rlc14
Hi -- I've been talking about the digital divide and the tech haves and have-nots for nearly ten years and I'll be darned if it's not only not going away, it's still with us and in some ways more pernicious than ever. I'll be talking about what has changed and what has stayed the same and what responses are working and not working.
The longer I've been a librarian, the more I've become a hobbyhorser for digital divide topics. It's not so much that the topic is more important to me, but that it seems, over time, to have become less important to everyone else. I think it's human nature to look around you and figure that what you see is the status quo everywhere. As more people get connected, they think everyone is getting connected.
Here's my status quo...
Quick background on me, I went to library school (UW) starting in 1993 and wrapped up after some travel and whatnot in 1996. This was the gap between text-based dumb terminal stuff and The Web. Interesting times. At that time the digital divide was firmly between students and teachers. We were making websites for school projects and teachers were having us print them out and put them on their desks.
Nowadays I live in rural Vermont and, like many people there, have a variety of jobs.
1. MetaFilter Director of Operations - keep people on the internet from yelling at each other but also helping them use the website, interact with each other online, resolve disputes, build features. You know how on most places on the internet they tell you "Never read the comments?" This place is, I hope, an exception.
2. Open Library support staff - I just picked up a job working at Open Library which is a project of the Internet Archive. We do ebook lending worldwide. You want to see confused people? Try explaining how a DRMed ebook download works to someone in Tanzania. The other downside to this job is that the powers that be at the Internet Archive firmly believe that their online library should be self-serve and bristle at paying for "support". Why can't people just figure it out? They'll ask. You've heard it before.
3. RTCC Drop-in Time - I work at a local vocational school in the adult education department teaching basic tech classes like "Where are my files?" and I also hang out one afternoon a week (it was two but hey budget cuts). I meet a lot of local people doing various things who need to use technology to do them. Before I came here I was away for a few days and my landlady's computer froze "Beachball!" she says and she waited until I got back so that I could fix it. She's not stupid, she's just .... not sure how all those processes work and one thing she knows about the computer is that it's expensive.
4. This sort of thing - staying/roaming - one of the things about the digital divide is that it's invisible, the people who are hardest to serve are also rarely on the TV or in the paper talking about their lives. That's why I'm so happy we have conferences like this one where we can all get together, share stories and ideas, and report back.
I'm also a stats/data/numbers nerd so I like to try to pull out numbers that tell a story that I think may not be otherwise getting told. I'll try not to make this too blablanumbersblablastats, but I think some of these facts are important for helping us understand some of this stuff.
Digital Divide - Access & Avoidance
I live in rural Vermont. The last town to get hooked up with electricity in my state was Victory Vermont in 1963 ... we're still dragging a little in terms of internet access too. I live in a small town, Randolph, of about 4500 people and we're digitally divided enough that when a new street gets wired, it makes the paper. That, and the people running cables through the woods with horse teams. Not kidding.
Ninety percent of Vermonters use the Internet (that ten percent is about 63,000 people) Ninety-four percent of those internet users have access from home (so 33,000 don't have internet at home) 30% of offline Vermonters cite "broadband not available" as their reason for not having broadband at home. 19K can't get it at all (which often means "haven't used it" especially for older folks).
When I lived in Seattle right after library school I was an AmeriCorps volunteer at Seattle Public Library and helped start the Wired for Learning program which taught tech skills to folks who needed them. In Seattle that was mostly low income folks, new immigrants and people with cognitive or physical disabilities.
My feeling was that I'd do that for a few years, then everyone would have learned the stuff and then we could move on to more sophisticated topics like copyright awareness, online privacy, that sort of thing. When I was first on ALA Council back in ... 2003-2006, people were still debating whether you could require someone to have an email address in order to participate in council.
Then I moved to the east coast which was a bit behind the west coast and to Vermont specifically which is in what I call a tech shadow ["offline and proud of it"] and to this day I'm still teaching "my first email" classes. I am not complaining, I love this work, but the sort of people who need a "my first email" class are different than they were, and the sort of other tech questions people have are different than they used to be.
What has changed?
Older digital divide topics were more along the lines of
- Lots of people still use the web on dial-up (so make sure your website works for them)
- Many people only have high speed access at the library (so make sure they can do assignments or whatever in chunks of time)
- Your public business really needs a website, even a basic one, that was not built by a 15 year old (nothing against them but they have an annoying tendency to grow up and leave town and take the passwords with them)
- Bad design is alienating. Sometimes makes sites impossible for tech novices, the color-blind, and other print-disabled users and people with mobility impairments
- 941K people in the US still use dial-up, it's a big number but it's a tiny percentage
- More people have device-based broadband which is actually often better for usability because people design for mobile
- Having websites is standard, now we worry about whether people should be on facebook or twitter
- Bad design is still a problem but nowadays there are more good examples out there for people to follow. Lawsuits have taken care of most companies having websites that work for the blind. Shame on them.
- People whose broadband is only through mobile devices often pay for bandwidth and can't use things that require an always-on connection (gaming, adobe) or frequent large updates (weekly software updates)
- Net neutrality is a worrisome issue being debated JUST THIS WEEK in the paper
- Filtering policies set by people who dont understand the web (RTCC examples: can't use Skype, seven month wait to get email unblocked)
- People forced to interact with websites that are hard/impossible to use (healthcare.gov) in order to get basic government services
- Digital natives are being taught by ... digital tourists and this is creating some weird etiquette schisms (TXLA encouraged me to "use the backchannel" which was a new term to my mom and I'm sure many other people).
- Still no national infrastructure for giving people the skills that they need to tackle this stuff even as we are starting to require them at a "this is what you need to be a citizen" level.
Digital Divide - Human & Social
I think a lot of people (and myself) can get really caught up in the needs and concerns of our own communities. That's important, our people are important and keeping them served and happy is really our main reason for being. I don't mean to be all "Keeping up with the joneses" about this but it's good to know where you and your people stand relative to the nation at large (and I won't even talk about the larger world, every time I hear about the broadband in Singapore it makes me despondent)
So, where I am, even though I am seeing people day in and day out who don't have internet at home except maybe through their smart phone, here are the realities presented with statistics. I've mushed together number from a few different reports. All my sources are linked at the bottom of this talk. A lot of them cite each other anyhow. It's tough to get good statistics from people you can't really hope to sell things to. There's very little money in studying the digital divide.
25% of offline people have someone else in the house who is online. Remember that now that people get online using mobile devices, access is often "personal" and people don't share access which changes the "Who is offline?" map a lot. A bit more that we know about these folks.
14% (of offline adults) say that they once used to use the internet, but have since stopped for some reason.
[in my drop-in time I see people who had a partner who died or left who used to "run the computer" in the household]
92% (of offline adults) say they are not interested in getting online
[just like we've found with other information needs, people only do the thing they don't want to do when they have a real reason to do so. It's nice if this is a neat thing like "buy that book you found on NPR" (how I met my current landlady) or "See the grandchildren" and not "Fight with your health insurance company" or "File for unemployment benefits"]
63% (of offline adults) say they would need help getting online
[and this means "outside of their current support network" one of the things we know about problems like poverty is that they become generationally institutionalized. If you're offline there's a good chance that your immediate friends and family are also offline]
Back to the US at large. 15% of adults don't use the internet at all. 47 million people. This was a big freakout when we found out that 40 million people didn't have healthcare and what did we do? We built a mandatory broken website for them to use to solve this problem. How much do you think this 40 million overlapped with that 47 million? A bunch, right?
IRS was one of the original organizations (along with the FCC) to study offline America (sidebar: why) and they found that people were pretty evenly split. Two (at least) divides with subdivides originally
1. Can't get access (can't afford, not available)
2. Don't want access (fear, stubborn)
Nowadays? Ten years later. About the same, a little more nuanced.
34% "Internet is not for me" (fear, stubborn, who knows)
32% "Internet is not easy to use" (need help, have challenges)
19% "Too expensive" (need access or need computer)
7% "Can't get it" (regulation is helping with this, but slowly)
The can't get access category is rapidly shrinking and is replaced by the "Don't get it" "Can't use it" category.
Serving those who are hardest to serve is part of WHAT WE DO but it's getting tougher as the less-hardest are finally getting online. The people who are left often have challenges, sometimes compounding ones.
- language challenges - non-english speakers, poor readers of their own language, dyslexia
- physical challenges - shaky hand, low vision
- cognitive/emotional challenges - bad memory, easily frustrated, "BUT WHY" responders
- "lifestyle" challenges - homelessness, poverty, other more important issues
Looking at this from a slightly different angle, there used to be just an economic divide (can't afford internet, can't afford computer), now we have
- usability divide
- low literacy "40% of the population has lower literacy skills"
- seniors - HUGE group, issues with vision, physical impairments, vocabulary (brains less plastic which is fine but need more assistance with terminology - Godzilla)
- low literacy "40% of the population has lower literacy skills"
- empowerment divide - esp with the social web
- 90% of users don't contribute, 9% contribute sporadically, and a tiny minority of 1% accounts for most contributions (wikipedia)
- people don't know how to search (am I right librarians??) and SEO is like the national pastime trying to mess with relevance/recall
- the less you pay the more you are the product being sold (cheap laptops, free webmail, free apps)
- 90% of users don't contribute, 9% contribute sporadically, and a tiny minority of 1% accounts for most contributions (wikipedia)
And I don't care what people say, the digital divide won't be solved by someone building a better website about computer skills. So stop giving htem money to do it.
Digital Divide and Libraries
So where do libraries come in? Well we've always been the institution for everyone, and we seem to have gotten the role of social safety net for the digital divide. I'm not complaining, exactly, but it would have been nice if that job had come with some money.
Libraries have responded to the demand by increasing access, doubling the number of public computers in the past 10 years. 91% of public libraries provide free Wi-Fi, and 74% of libraries report use of Wi-Fi increased in 2011. 62% of public libraries report that they are the only source of free public access to computers and the internet in their communities. 60% report increased use of public internet computers.
Yay libraries.
Back to the topic at hand, libraries, and rural libraries. Was everyone else watching the ice breakers on the lake with bated breath all weekend? And following the ferry company on facebook? I know I was. 47% of all public libraries are rural, but they serve just over 12% of the target library service population in the United States
And the definition of rural has changed, at least according to the govt.
In 2006, National Center for Ed Stats redesigned & redefined "rural." Rural locations used to just be "Within the metropolitan statistical area" or not. Now they're broken down into three separate categories: fringe rural, distant rural, and remote rural
VT - 79% rural, 98.7% small (small = less than 25K people)
MI - 49% rural, 77% small
And there are some real differences between urban/rural library situations
- 76% of libraries offer access to e-books, and 39% of libraries provide e-readers for check-out by patrons
57% of urban libraries offer broadband speeds greater than 10 Mbps, as compared to 17% of rural libraries - e-books are available from 92% of urban libraries, compared to 65% of rural libraries
[4% of readers read e-books exclusively.] - 15% of library websites are optimized for mobile devices
36% of urban libraries have websites optimized for mobile devices, compared to 9% of rural libraries (where you sometimes can't get a signal)
Technology training classes are provided by 63% of urban libraries, compared to 32% of rural libraries - Rural: 62% of residents say the library is important and 48% have library cards
City: 71% say the library is important to them and 59% have library cards.
Suburbs: 69% say the library is important and 61% have library cards.
However, we sometimes get stuck in little eddies in our rural locations (good ones and bad ones - my library had to rethink its privacy policies because the usual "an email address is for one person only" thing doesn't hold true where I am. Good on them for thinking about it and not telling people they were using email wrong) where lack of tech understanding leads to continued tech apprehension and a normalizing of the offline life that may be counterproductive for people.
(story about Chris who doesn't drive)
Now, people are welcome to make choices about how much they want to interact with technology in their lives whether it's cars or Candy Crush. At the same time, people need to be realistic that their decision to opt out comes with social costs. And that while we're happy, in most cases, to be available for My First Email classes, it's no more appropriate for us to type a letter for someone (something I've been asked) or ask us to build "a small website" for them (ditto) than it would be for them to ask us to read a book to them (though I'd be happy to help them with the technology that would make that work).
Things digitally divided people are missing out on, a short list... everyone has one of these, this is mine
- connections to people/businesses (twitter backdoor)
- lower prices, different marketplaces, coupons (esp necessary for rural folks)
- civic engagement (white house petitions, DMV stuff, hunting and fishing licenses)
And I don't want to be all "Oh the internet is transformative and disruptive and so edgy and flips the script and makes everything better for everyone"... since for everyone who is using Twitter to spark Arab Spring there are 10,000 who are harassing everyone on facebook to play bejweled blitz.
But we have an opportunity here to not treat this as just a content reservoir where we can be passive consumers laughing at cat pictures (though that is part of it) but as an interactive tool where we can make our ourselves heard, express ourselves, find other people like us (who sometimes may not be in our exact rural locations). And heling people do THAT is the job that we have in front of us today.
Gandhi is quoted a lot as saying "Be the change you want to see in the world", but it's a bit of a paraphrase of his longer statement. "We but mirror the world. All the tendencies present in the outer world are to be found in the world of our body. If we could change ourselves, the tendencies in the world would also change. As a man changes his own nature, so does the attitude of the world change towards him.... We need not wait to see what others do."
So while we can't always act like we've got broadband when we don't, we can act like we know how to use this tool for good and how to mitigate its downsides and how to accentuate its upsides, to help people get over the empowerment divide which the one that is the most challenging right now. For patrons, for rule makers, for information professionals. Everyone's got their own digital divide but helping to kick the ball down the field a little more is helping to mirror the world you want to see.
One of the things I always do when I would teach my facebook classes, then and now, was to tell the people who were learning to be social online that if they didn't know who to add as a friend, they could always add me. One person who is not going to fill your wall with political fights or spam or embarrass you in front of your mom. I know it's a bit like that "Well I helped this starfish...!" parable except that as a profession, if we're all doing that, modeling good internet use, showing people that it is possible to use it, work with it, connect with it and even enjoy it... we really have the power to help a lot of people get over, what ever it is that they have to get over, to be where they want to be.
Resources
Who's Not Online and Why
http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/09/25/whos-not-online-and-why/
Libraries Connect Communities: Public Library Funding & Technology Access Study, 2011-2012
http://www.ala.org/research/plftas/2011_2012
ARSL Market Research Report
http://arsl.info/2013/07/market-research-report/
ARSL - defining rural
http://arsl.info/2012/02/what-is-rural/
Am I Rural?
http://www.raconline.org/amirural
Rural Library Clearinghouse
http://www.resourceroundup.net
NYPL Tech Guide Handouts
https://sites.google.com/a/nypl.org/techconnect/all
From Distant Admirers to Library Lovers and beyond
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/03/13/library-engagement-typology/
IMLS - Public Libraries in the US
http://www.imls.gov/research/public_libraries_in_the_us_fy_2010_report.aspx
2012 Vermont Telecommunications Survey
Long ugly PDF URL under here
Healthcare.gov and the Gulf Between Planning and Reality
http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2013/11/healthcare-gov-and-the-gulf-between-planning-and-reality/
The Myth of the Digtal Native
http://chronicle.com/article/Confronting-the-Myth-of-the/145949/
Digital Divide: The 3 Stages
http://www.nngroup.com/articles/digital-divide-the-three-stages/
Free User Experience Reports
http://www.nngroup.com/reports/free/
NCES Identification of Rural Locales
http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/rural_locales.asp